A good review doesn’t need a score to get its point across, it just has to validate its opinion and give the reasons why the game is both good and bad. Most sites like IGN, Kotaku and Gamespot still don’t get this idea (lol 7.5 for Skyward Sword lolololol is that because the reviewer was incapable of playing the game?).

Regarding camera/aiming, I understand that it’s a dual-analog scheme crammed into a limited 3DS – a device not meant to recreate the shitty FPS market for a handheld audience. Normally, the digital-input (buttons) camera is fine in a third-person movement situation, like Crytal Bearers, but using it for the damn gun – this demo shows they didn’t have the decency to find a real solution. On top of that, all your context actions have been shoved to the dpad, requiring complete stops.

Then there’s standing/crouching/lying – for the last decade it’s apparently impossible to change positions in single, smooth actions, often requiring you to make complete stops (or roll around by accident). This is evergreen retardation.

This is beyond MH Tri’s lack of Wii Pointer aiming. Fuck this nonsense.

I’m so happy to see third parties are still on the trainwreck to failure on Nintendo systems. GOOD LUCK SELLING YOUR SHIT ON A HANDHELD THAT WON’T SELL OUTSIDE OF JAPAN MORONS (PS Vita).

Gaming retail, its pretty much the reason people are trying to shove DIGITAL COPIES of full games you have to wait three hours to download for.

Still not as bad as GAMING MEDIA though. At least it gives me entertainment for free.

Retailers overprice the game and everything, then scream about not making enough money since everybody are refusing to continue to buy overpriced stuff, so in response they jack up the price in a misguided attempt to make money instead of fixing the asinine retailer-distributor relationship where everyone double dip the supply chain well before it ever gets to the shelve. Evidence, overpriced Steam prices in digital games which has the same distribution costs worldwide.

FUCK OFF.

And then you realize that the legendary Pokemon is an utter piece of shit, like Victini…

Is 3.5 meant to be good or bad? Sites are still stuck in the stone-age with the concept of review scores.

IE: Most of them are sometimes egotistical close-minded asswits.